effortly
A preliminary analysis of the effort required for reproducing computational science scholarly articles.
About
The idea of estimating the underlying effort in reproducing scholarly articles is slightly new, and the NIH article serves as a good starting point to get some historical perspective on the topic. In an attempt to estimate “Effort in Reproducibility”, we collected replication reports from Machine Learning Reproducibility Challenge (2020, 2021). The primary goal of ML Reproducibility Challenge was to have a community of researchers investigate the claims made in scholarly articles published at top conferences. The community selected papers and attempted to verify the claims made in the paper by reproducing computational experiments. The reports published on ReScience were a by-product outlining the underlying effort behind reproducing the papers. We believe these reports to be a good starting point for understanding the operational framework of reproducibility. The reports had detailed information about the scope of reproducibility and what was easy and difficult for the researchers while replicating the original article.
Overview
Repository structure
├── data
│ ├── original-pdfs
│ ├── pdfs
│ │ ├── 10_5281-zenodo_1003214.pdf
│ │ ├── ...
│ │ ├── 10_5281-zenodo_890884.pdf
│ ├── ReScience.csv
│ ├── ReScience_JCDL-23.csv
│ ├── ReScience_ML_repro_challenge_alpha.csv
│ └── sciparse_outputs
│ ├── 10_5281-zenodo_1003214.json
│ ├── .........
│ ├── 10_5281-zenodo_1289889.json
├── LICENSE
├── media
│ ├── inductive_analysis.png
│ └── quantitative_analysis.png
├── notebooks
│ └── JCDL-23_Effort_of_Reproducibility.ipynb
├── README.md
├── slides
│ ├── JCDL'23 _ Effort of Reproducibility.pdf
│ └── JCDL'23 _ Effort of Reproducibility.pptx
└── src
└── util.py
Notebook
Data Collection
In an effort to build a consolidated repository of datasets pertaining to reproducibility of scholarly articles, we initiated reproducibility/datasets. The central idea here was to work towards studying “All things Reproducibility in Science”. Data collection for ReScience was a part of it and gathering the data was accomplished using methods from the following util file.
Data Description
The Machine Learning Reproducibility Challenge (2020, 2021) had a total of 87 articles, of which 15 were removed because they didn’t belong to the discipline of machine learning. Additionally, two more articles were removed from the final dataset because they were editorials. The final dataset comprised of 70 articles and said analysis was made on these respective articles.
Authors
PI, and Co-PI
Acknowledgement
This work is supported in part by NSF Grant No. 2022443.
Citation
If you find this work useful, please cite our paper:
```bibtex @article{akella2023JCDL, title=, author={Akhil Pandey Akella and David Koop and Hamed Alhoori}, journal={Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), ACM/IEEE}, year={2023} }